Back to Blog

Understanding Oregon’s Deadlines for Construction Defect Claims

Oregon’s Deadlines for Construction Defect Claims

With Oregon’s passage of House Bill 3746, community associations need to be especially mindful of the deadlines that govern construction defect claims. Two different legal concepts apply: the statute of limitations and the statute of repose. Together, they determine when a claim must be filed—and when it is too late.

The Two Clocks

1. Statute of Limitations – 2 Years from Discovery

Oregon law requires that most property damage claims, including construction defects, be filed within 2 years of the date the defect was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered. This is often called the “discovery rule.”

For example:
If water intrusion is discovered in March 2027, the association generally has until March 2029 to file suit—provided the repose period has not expired.

2. Statute of Repose – 7 Years from Substantial Completion

HB 3746 shortens the absolute cut-off for construction defect claims. Beginning January 1, 2026, no claim may be brought more than 7 years after substantial completion of construction, with a limited 1-year grace period if the defect is discovered in years 6 or 7.

This is a hard deadline. If the repose period has expired, claims are barred—even if the defect was just discovered and there is time remaining on the statute of limitations.

For example:
A condominium completed in 2020 will be outside the repose window after 2027 (or 2028 if a defect was discovered in year 7).  If water intrusion is first discovered in 2029, it is too late to bring claims against responsible parties.

Why This Matters for Boards and Managers

  • Earlier Action Required: Associations can no longer wait until year 8, 9, or 10 to identify and pursue claims.
  • Inspection Planning: Regular building inspections, especially in years 2, 6, and 7, are now essential for catching problems while claims are still viable.
  • Procedural Precision: Associations must also comply with HB 3746’s new notice and voting procedures before filing suit. Skipping steps could lead to dismissal.
  • Budgeting and Reserves: Boards should factor the cost of professional inspections and potential legal action into their long-term financial planning.

Key Takeaway

Community associations in Oregon must operate under a two-part deadline system:

2 years from discovery (limitations period), but never more than 7 years (with up to 1 extra year) from substantial completion (repose period).

Boards and managers should work closely with counsel and engineers to monitor building conditions, schedule inspections, and act quickly when issues are found.

Related posts

Stay informed with weekly blogs, legal updates, HOA e-newsletters, and free webinars led by our attorneys. Board members and community managers can also browse our glossary and download best practice tips on governance, disputes, and compliance.
  • Washington Construction deadline

    Washington’s Deadlines for Construction Defect Claims

    Washington law sets specific deadlines for when construction defect claims can be brought. These deadlines…

    Read More
  • Oregon House Bill 3746: What Community Associations Need to Know

    Oregon House Bill 3746: What Community Associations Need to Know

    The Oregon Legislature recently passed House Bill 3746, a sweeping change to how condominium and…

    Read More
  • Florida Construction deadline

    Understanding Florida’s Deadlines for Construction Defect Claims

    Florida law sets clear deadlines for construction defect claims. These deadlines include a statute of…

    Read More
  • Does Insurance Cover My Creative Work

    Does Insurance Cover My Creative Work?

    What Artists, Makers, and Content Creators Need to Know If I had to guess, I’d…

    Read More

    If your homeowners' association is looking for a dedicated staff, you'll find them at Barker Martin. Our HOA had been in discussions with the developer for some time, but had made little progress. Barker Martin explained the process clearly, always kept us up-to-date, and worked extremely hard to bring the situation to a successful ending. They work not just for you, but with you. Our construction project is within days of completion. There is no way we could have accomplished it without Barker Martin.

    Ann Koppy, Village at West Park Condominium

    On behalf of Timberton Village Homeowners Association Board of Directors, I would like to express our sincerest appreciation for the efforts of the entire Barker Martin Team for the successful defense of the protracted lawsuit against our association. Many thanks to the Team for their advice and guidance throughout the process our stressful lawsuit. The time and effort spent in getting to know our association was impressive.

    Bill Centobene, Timberton Village Homeowners Association

    Our HOA felt we were in a hopeless situation with minimal legal rights and we didn't trust anyone after what our builders put us through. Dan Zimberoff was always "cautiously optimistic" about our case, but in the end he had turned our situation into a major win that no one expected. I would recommend Barker Martin to all my friends with complete confidence. Dan will be our HOA attorney for many years to come

    Josie Adams, 1100 East Howell Owners Association

Ready to protect your community?

Ready to protect your community?

Whether you're facing a pressing legal issue or just need trusted guidance, we're here to help. Let’s discuss your needs—no pressure, no jargon, just honest advice from experienced HOA & condo law professionals.