Back to Blog

Washington’s Deadlines for Construction Defect Claims

Washington Construction deadline

Washington law sets specific deadlines for when construction defect claims can be brought. These deadlines include both a statute of limitations (which depends on the type of claim) and a statute of repose (which provides an absolute cut-off). Together, they determine when a claim must be filed.

Statute of Repose – 6 Years from Substantial Completion

Under RCW 4.16.310, construction defect claims in Washington are subject to a statute of repose. No claim may be brought more than 6 years after substantial completion of construction, or more than 6 years after the termination of services described in the statute (design, planning, construction, etc.), whichever is later.

This is a hard deadline. If a defect has not caused damage or otherwise led to an actionable claim within that 6‑year window, the claim is barred regardless of when the defect is discovered.

Statute of Limitations / Accrual

Once a claim accrues (meaning damage occurs, or the defect is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered), the statute of limitations begins to run. The applicable period depends on the type of claim:

  • Breach of written contract: 6 years
  • Tort/negligence: typically 3 years
  • Condominium construction defect claims (RCW 64.90.680): 4 years
  • Other statutory or contractual remedies: period varies

Importantly, the claim must still accrue within the 6‑year repose period. If a defect first causes damage after that period, it is too late to bring claims even if the statute of limitations would otherwise allow it.

Post‑Completion Services and the Nexus Requirement

Washington courts apply a ‘nexus requirement’ to determine whether post‑completion services (such as later repairs or inspections) can extend the accrual period. Only if those services are directly connected to the alleged defect may they extend the time for claims.

Notice and Right to Repair

Washington law also requires, in many cases, that homeowners or associations provide contractors with notice of alleged defects and an opportunity to repair before filing suit. This procedural step can affect the timing of claims and must be carefully followed.

Why This Matters for Boards and Managers

  • Claims must accrue within 6 years of substantial completion, or they are barred.
  • Associations should schedule regular inspections to identify defects early.
  • The type of claim (contract vs. tort) determines how long you have to file once damage is discovered.
  • Boards must follow notice and right‑to‑repair procedures to preserve claims.

Key Takeaway

Washington associations must track two deadlines:

  • A strict 6‑year statute of repose after substantial completion, and
  • A statute of limitations that runs from the time of discovery or accrual (3 to 6 years depending on the claim).

Related posts

Stay informed with weekly blogs, legal updates, HOA e-newsletters, and free webinars led by our attorneys. Board members and community managers can also browse our glossary and download best practice tips on governance, disputes, and compliance.
  • Oregon House Bill 3746: What Community Associations Need to Know

    Oregon House Bill 3746: What Community Associations Need to Know

    The Oregon Legislature recently passed House Bill 3746, a sweeping change to how condominium and…

    Read More
  • Oregon’s Deadlines for Construction Defect Claims

    Understanding Oregon’s Deadlines for Construction Defect Claims

    With Oregon’s passage of House Bill 3746, community associations need to be especially mindful of…

    Read More
  • Florida Construction deadline

    Understanding Florida’s Deadlines for Construction Defect Claims

    Florida law sets clear deadlines for construction defect claims. These deadlines include a statute of…

    Read More
  • Does Insurance Cover My Creative Work

    Does Insurance Cover My Creative Work?

    What Artists, Makers, and Content Creators Need to Know If I had to guess, I’d…

    Read More

    If your homeowners' association is looking for a dedicated staff, you'll find them at Barker Martin. Our HOA had been in discussions with the developer for some time, but had made little progress. Barker Martin explained the process clearly, always kept us up-to-date, and worked extremely hard to bring the situation to a successful ending. They work not just for you, but with you. Our construction project is within days of completion. There is no way we could have accomplished it without Barker Martin.

    Ann Koppy, Village at West Park Condominium

    On behalf of Timberton Village Homeowners Association Board of Directors, I would like to express our sincerest appreciation for the efforts of the entire Barker Martin Team for the successful defense of the protracted lawsuit against our association. Many thanks to the Team for their advice and guidance throughout the process our stressful lawsuit. The time and effort spent in getting to know our association was impressive.

    Bill Centobene, Timberton Village Homeowners Association

    Our HOA felt we were in a hopeless situation with minimal legal rights and we didn't trust anyone after what our builders put us through. Dan Zimberoff was always "cautiously optimistic" about our case, but in the end he had turned our situation into a major win that no one expected. I would recommend Barker Martin to all my friends with complete confidence. Dan will be our HOA attorney for many years to come

    Josie Adams, 1100 East Howell Owners Association

Ready to protect your community?

Ready to protect your community?

Whether you're facing a pressing legal issue or just need trusted guidance, we're here to help. Let’s discuss your needs—no pressure, no jargon, just honest advice from experienced HOA & condo law professionals.