Back to Blogs

Reductions in Property Value Due to the Presence of Construction Defects

Last month the Oregon Supreme Court recognized and seemingly affirmed a strategy to reduce taxable property value due to the existence of construction defects. In Oakmont, LLC v. Oregon Dept. of Revenue (2016), the owner of an apartment complex valued at approximately $21million negotiated with the county assessor to reduce the taxable value by sixty and seventy percent respectively for two years.  The owner sought a similar reduction for an earlier tax year based on the presence of a “likely error” in the assessor’s valuation then, but was denied.

That denial became the subject of an appeal where the Oregon Supreme Court ruled, among other things, that even defects that are latent or unknown during the tax years in question can be a proper basis for a reduction in taxable value.  The court reasoned that “real market value” is determined from the standpoint of an “informed buyer . . . who would have engaged in a reasonable inspection of the property and thus would have learned facts that a reasonable inspection on the date of the evaluation would have revealed.”  

The decision recognizes the possibility for a reduction in an owner’s assessed property value due to the presence of construction defects.  One relatively simple way to value the reduction in property value is to reduce by the amount of the cost to repair the construction defects and damage. In Oakmont, the agreed reductions were based on the cost to repair the defects and damage at issue as well as the associated loss in rental income during the repair period.

The decision also underscores the common sense requirement than an appeal of assessed value be supported by an opinion from a qualified expert that the construction defects and/or damage existed at the time of the tax years in question.  An owner will also need a reliable opinion of the cost to repair the defects at the time.

Although the Oakmont case is from Oregon, the court’s reasoning and rationale could be argued in other jurisdictions.    

If you have questions regarding this subject, don’t hesitate to contact me or my colleagues at Barer Martin.  

Related posts

Stay informed with weekly blogs, legal updates, HOA e-newsletters, and free webinars led by our attorneys. Board members and community managers can also browse our glossary and download best practice tips on governance, disputes, and compliance.
  • Welcome to Our New Site

    Read More
  • Good News for Good Boards from the Supreme Court of Washington

    Late last week, the Washington Supreme court issued a split opinion in Surowiecki v Hat Island that means…

    Read More
  • OR Nondiscrimination Declaration

    In 2021, the Oregon legislature enacted House Bill 2534-A (“HB 2434-A”), which prohibits discrimination based…

    Read More
  • Nonprofit Act Changes

    As of January 1, 2022, Washington State has a new law that applies to all…

    Read More

    If your homeowners' association is looking for a dedicated staff, you'll find them at Barker Martin. Our HOA had been in discussions with the developer for some time, but had made little progress. Barker Martin explained the process clearly, always kept us up-to-date, and worked extremely hard to bring the situation to a successful ending. They work not just for you, but with you. Our construction project is within days of completion. There is no way we could have accomplished it without Barker Martin.

    Ann Koppy, Village at West Park Condominium

    On behalf of Timberton Village Homeowners Association Board of Directors, I would like to express our sincerest appreciation for the efforts of the entire Barker Martin Team for the successful defense of the protracted lawsuit against our association. Many thanks to the Team for their advice and guidance throughout the process our stressful lawsuit. The time and effort spent in getting to know our association was impressive.

    Bill Centobene, Timberton Village Homeowners Association

    Our HOA felt we were in a hopeless situation with minimal legal rights and we didn't trust anyone after what our builders put us through. Dan Zimberoff was always "cautiously optimistic" about our case, but in the end he had turned our situation into a major win that no one expected. I would recommend Barker Martin to all my friends with complete confidence. Dan will be our HOA attorney for many years to come

    Josie Adams, 1100 East Howell Owners Association

Ready to protect your community?

Ready to protect your community?

Whether you're facing a pressing legal issue or just need trusted guidance, we're here to help. Let’s discuss your needs—no pressure, no jargon, just honest advice from experienced HOA & condo law professionals.