Back to Blogs

Court Affirms “Discovery Rule” in First-Party Insurance Claim

We have been writing quite a bit over the last couple of years about the evolving legal landscape of first-party insurance claims in the Pacific Northwest.  As more community associations that are otherwise outside of the window to bring construction defect claims for property damage instead bring claims under their own historical insurance policies, courts are getting more of an opportunity to address key issues.

Just a couple of days ago, in Eagle Harbor Condominium Association v. Allstate Insurance , a federal district court in Seattle denied a defendant insurance company request to find that its liability was cut off, at the latest, one year after the end of its last policy period.  In rejecting the insurance company’s request, the court found that a discovery rule applies to both “collapse type” claims that rely on hidden decay as well as other claims based on water intrusion.

The facts were similar to a lot of community associations who are finding long hidden damage as they prepare to renew their buildings.  The stucco clad structures at issue were built in 1968 and 1980. Defendant Allstate insurance insured the buildings from 1988 to 1997.  During this time the condominium suffered “ongoing and progressive damage” to stairwells, decks and other areas.  The association repaired  the areas as needed, but while repairing a stair tower in approximately 2014 noticed extensive damage and tendered the claims to Allstate, it past carrier, shortly thereafter.

In denying the Allstate Insurance’s request to effectively cut off its liability to pay claims just one year after it last policy period in 1998, the court affirmed the right to bring a claim within one year of discovery.

“Discovery”, in its legal context, can mean a lot of things. It is generally understood to mean when an issue was discovered, or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have been discovered. The determination of when a loss is discovered can therefore be very fact specific.

The Eagle Harbor ruling underscores that insurance claims brought under insurance policies from long ago may be a viable option for communities having to repair significant property damage.  It is also a critical reminder to consult with qualified consultants and attorneys as soon as you “discover” significant property damage to ensure that any claims are preserved.

Related posts

Stay informed with weekly blogs, legal updates, HOA e-newsletters, and free webinars led by our attorneys. Board members and community managers can also browse our glossary and download best practice tips on governance, disputes, and compliance.
  • Welcome to Our New Site

    Read More
  • Good News for Good Boards from the Supreme Court of Washington

    Late last week, the Washington Supreme court issued a split opinion in Surowiecki v Hat Island that means…

    Read More
  • OR Nondiscrimination Declaration

    In 2021, the Oregon legislature enacted House Bill 2534-A (“HB 2434-A”), which prohibits discrimination based…

    Read More
  • Nonprofit Act Changes

    As of January 1, 2022, Washington State has a new law that applies to all…

    Read More

    If your homeowners' association is looking for a dedicated staff, you'll find them at Barker Martin. Our HOA had been in discussions with the developer for some time, but had made little progress. Barker Martin explained the process clearly, always kept us up-to-date, and worked extremely hard to bring the situation to a successful ending. They work not just for you, but with you. Our construction project is within days of completion. There is no way we could have accomplished it without Barker Martin.

    Ann Koppy, Village at West Park Condominium

    On behalf of Timberton Village Homeowners Association Board of Directors, I would like to express our sincerest appreciation for the efforts of the entire Barker Martin Team for the successful defense of the protracted lawsuit against our association. Many thanks to the Team for their advice and guidance throughout the process our stressful lawsuit. The time and effort spent in getting to know our association was impressive.

    Bill Centobene, Timberton Village Homeowners Association

    Our HOA felt we were in a hopeless situation with minimal legal rights and we didn't trust anyone after what our builders put us through. Dan Zimberoff was always "cautiously optimistic" about our case, but in the end he had turned our situation into a major win that no one expected. I would recommend Barker Martin to all my friends with complete confidence. Dan will be our HOA attorney for many years to come

    Josie Adams, 1100 East Howell Owners Association

Ready to protect your community?

Ready to protect your community?

Whether you're facing a pressing legal issue or just need trusted guidance, we're here to help. Let’s discuss your needs—no pressure, no jargon, just honest advice from experienced HOA & condo law professionals.