Back to Blogs

Foreclosure: Judicial vs. Non-Judicial

In both Washington and Oregon, community associations that have lien rights for nonpayment of assessments have two options when considering foreclosing on units or lots:  judicial or non-judicial foreclosure.  Whether a foreclosure is judicial or non-judicial is significant as each have their own processes, procedures, and timelines for terminating the owner’s ownership interest in the property.

A judicial foreclosure is basically a foreclosure that goes through the courts.  The Association would file a lawsuit and serve the foreclosure summons and complaint on the owner and all other lienholders whose interest is junior to the one being foreclosed. Once the court enters judgment and “decree of foreclosure,” the Association can initiate the sheriff’s sale process where the property is auctioned by the sheriff and the winning bidder ultimately becomes the legal title owner of the property.   However, the buyer only obtains title after the “redemption period,” which is the time period in which the owner can keep the unit or lot by paying the winning bidder essentially everything the bidder paid. The length of the redemption period is determined by state law. In Washington, the redemption period is generally 8 or 12 months after the date of the sheriff’s sale. The redemption period in Oregon is 180 days after the date of the sheriff’s sale. Once the redemption period expires, the sheriff will issue a “sheriff’s deed” to the winning bidder, who then becomes the legal, title owner of the property.

As the name implies, a non-judicial foreclosure does not go through the courts.  Instead, it is administered by a third party “trustee,” ultimately resulting in a “trustee’s sale.”  If an Association wants to do a non-judicial foreclosure, the governing documents have to specifically authorize that option and contain certain language required by state law.  Because the process is not overseen by the courts, additional steps must be taken and very strict notice requirements must be met. Prior to initiating the non-judicial foreclosure sale, the Association must serve notice of default on the owner that contains specific information.  If the owner does not cure the default during the time period prescribed in the notice of default, then the Association must mail a notice of trustee’s sale containing the date, time and place of the trustee’s sale to the owner, all junior lienholders, and any other parties of interest. If the owner does not submit payment to cure the default, the property is then auctioned by the trustee at the trustee’s sale.  Unlike the judicial foreclosure, there is no right of redemption for non-judicial foreclosures, which means that the trustee’s deed is issued to the winning bidder immediately upon the sale, and the buyer becomes the legal, title owner of the property.

There are many pros and cons of each process and the type of foreclosure an Association may be proscribed by the governing documents.  If you have any questions about the foreclosure process, whether judicial or non-judicial, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Related posts

Stay informed with weekly blogs, legal updates, HOA e-newsletters, and free webinars led by our attorneys. Board members and community managers can also browse our glossary and download best practice tips on governance, disputes, and compliance.
  • Welcome to Our New Site

    Read More
  • Good News for Good Boards from the Supreme Court of Washington

    Late last week, the Washington Supreme court issued a split opinion in Surowiecki v Hat Island that means…

    Read More
  • OR Nondiscrimination Declaration

    In 2021, the Oregon legislature enacted House Bill 2534-A (“HB 2434-A”), which prohibits discrimination based…

    Read More
  • Nonprofit Act Changes

    As of January 1, 2022, Washington State has a new law that applies to all…

    Read More

    If your homeowners' association is looking for a dedicated staff, you'll find them at Barker Martin. Our HOA had been in discussions with the developer for some time, but had made little progress. Barker Martin explained the process clearly, always kept us up-to-date, and worked extremely hard to bring the situation to a successful ending. They work not just for you, but with you. Our construction project is within days of completion. There is no way we could have accomplished it without Barker Martin.

    Ann Koppy, Village at West Park Condominium

    On behalf of Timberton Village Homeowners Association Board of Directors, I would like to express our sincerest appreciation for the efforts of the entire Barker Martin Team for the successful defense of the protracted lawsuit against our association. Many thanks to the Team for their advice and guidance throughout the process our stressful lawsuit. The time and effort spent in getting to know our association was impressive.

    Bill Centobene, Timberton Village Homeowners Association

    Our HOA felt we were in a hopeless situation with minimal legal rights and we didn't trust anyone after what our builders put us through. Dan Zimberoff was always "cautiously optimistic" about our case, but in the end he had turned our situation into a major win that no one expected. I would recommend Barker Martin to all my friends with complete confidence. Dan will be our HOA attorney for many years to come

    Josie Adams, 1100 East Howell Owners Association

Ready to protect your community?

Ready to protect your community?

Whether you're facing a pressing legal issue or just need trusted guidance, we're here to help. Let’s discuss your needs—no pressure, no jargon, just honest advice from experienced HOA & condo law professionals.