Back to Blogs

The Insurable Interest Vortex

There is a roadside attraction in Oregon called the Oregon Vortex, where purported paranormal forces cause a number of optical illusions and oddities. It is definitely on my bucket list of Pacific Northwest attractions I want to visit. I have, however, made several visits to what I call the “Insurable Interest” vortex. While I doubt paranormal forces are at work with this vortex, it is worth a word of warning.

Many of you have heard me preach about first-party insurance claims. One of the benefits of a first-party insurance claim is that insureds can often seek coverage under their historic insurance policies. This is a benefit because the language of older policies might be more favorable and older policies might have a reduced impact on future premiums. But, what happens when the property was sold somewhere along the historic timeline? This is where the insurable interest vortex may occur.

In order to trigger property insurance, you must have an “insurable interest” in the property. Generally, some form of ownership is required. Although there are some exceptions, an insured must have an interest in the property when the policy is purchased and when the loss occurs. I have encountered situations where a property is purchased, property damage is discovered after the sale, and we attempt to trigger historic insurance policies. The past insurer refused to pay the buyer because it was not an insured on the prior policy. The past insurer also refused to pay the seller, because it no longer had an “insurable interest” in the property. Hence, the vortex.  

Most insurance policies prohibit any assignment of the rights and duties of the policy. As a result, a seller cannot simply assign the policy to the buyer. Many courts, however, do allow an assignment of the proceeds of an insurance claim. Both buyers and sellers should be cognizant of the insurable interest vortex and add necessary language in their agreement to ensure the property has seamless coverage.

Entrance to the Oregon Vortex is $12.75. If an insured gets trapped in the insurable interest vortex, the price of admission may well be a significant uncovered loss.

Related posts

Stay informed with weekly blogs, legal updates, HOA e-newsletters, and free webinars led by our attorneys. Board members and community managers can also browse our glossary and download best practice tips on governance, disputes, and compliance.
  • Welcome to Our New Site

    Read More
  • Good News for Good Boards from the Supreme Court of Washington

    Late last week, the Washington Supreme court issued a split opinion in Surowiecki v Hat Island that means…

    Read More
  • OR Nondiscrimination Declaration

    In 2021, the Oregon legislature enacted House Bill 2534-A (“HB 2434-A”), which prohibits discrimination based…

    Read More
  • Nonprofit Act Changes

    As of January 1, 2022, Washington State has a new law that applies to all…

    Read More

    If your homeowners' association is looking for a dedicated staff, you'll find them at Barker Martin. Our HOA had been in discussions with the developer for some time, but had made little progress. Barker Martin explained the process clearly, always kept us up-to-date, and worked extremely hard to bring the situation to a successful ending. They work not just for you, but with you. Our construction project is within days of completion. There is no way we could have accomplished it without Barker Martin.

    Ann Koppy, Village at West Park Condominium

    On behalf of Timberton Village Homeowners Association Board of Directors, I would like to express our sincerest appreciation for the efforts of the entire Barker Martin Team for the successful defense of the protracted lawsuit against our association. Many thanks to the Team for their advice and guidance throughout the process our stressful lawsuit. The time and effort spent in getting to know our association was impressive.

    Bill Centobene, Timberton Village Homeowners Association

    Our HOA felt we were in a hopeless situation with minimal legal rights and we didn't trust anyone after what our builders put us through. Dan Zimberoff was always "cautiously optimistic" about our case, but in the end he had turned our situation into a major win that no one expected. I would recommend Barker Martin to all my friends with complete confidence. Dan will be our HOA attorney for many years to come

    Josie Adams, 1100 East Howell Owners Association

Ready to protect your community?

Ready to protect your community?

Whether you're facing a pressing legal issue or just need trusted guidance, we're here to help. Let’s discuss your needs—no pressure, no jargon, just honest advice from experienced HOA & condo law professionals.