Back to Blogs

Limited Common Elements

Are we dealing with part of a unit, the common elements or a limited common element?  This is often the first question when analyzing maintenance, repair and replacement responsibilities in a condominium.  That question also often relates to: Who pays?

Today, let’s focus just on identifying limited common elements, which can be a little tricky sometimes.  The Washington Condo Act defines limited common elements:

RCW 64.34.020 (27) “Limited common element” means a portion of the common elements allocated by the declaration or by operation of RCW 64.34.204 (2) or (4) for the exclusive use of one or more but fewer than all of the units.

Thus, in order to identify limited common elements, you need to review the declaration and RCW 64.34.204(2) and (4) which states:

Except as provided by the declaration:

(2) If any chute, flue, duct, wire, conduit, bearing wall, bearing column, or any other fixture lies partially within and partially outside the designated boundaries of a unit, any portion thereof serving only that unit is a limited common element allocated solely to that unit, and any portion thereof serving more than one unit or any portion of the common elements is a part of the common elements.

(4) Any shutters, awnings, window boxes, doorsteps, stoops, porches, balconies, patios, and all exterior doors and windows or other fixtures designed to serve a single unit, but which are located outside the unit’s boundaries, are limited common elements allocated exclusively to that unit.

Going through the complete analysis is important.  For example, many people may assume that an exterior awning is a common element because it located outside of the unit boundary.  Before reaching that conclusion, you must determine:  Is the awning serving a single unit?  Does the declaration provide otherwise?  The “except as provided by the declaration” language in RCW 64.34.204 makes it possible for the declaration to vary the default rules in RCW 64.34.204.  The point is:  Don’t assume something is a limited common element without analyzing the question.

In Oregon, the analysis is a little easier.  Oregon’s Condo Act defines limited common elements as:

ORS 100.005 (17) “Limited common elements” means those common elements designated in the declaration, as reserved for the use of a certain unit or number of units, to the exclusion of the other units.

Keep in mind, however, that an Oregon declaration may “reserve a common element” for the “use of a certain unit or number of units” without using the “limited common element” label.

Determining whether something is part of a unit, a limited common element, or a common element (or general common element in Oregon), is not typically the end of analyzing a community association issue, but it is an important first step.

Do not hesitate to reach out to us at Barker Martin if you have a question on this, or any other condominium or homeowner association legal issue.

Related posts

Stay informed with weekly blogs, legal updates, HOA e-newsletters, and free webinars led by our attorneys. Board members and community managers can also browse our glossary and download best practice tips on governance, disputes, and compliance.
  • Welcome to Our New Site

    Read More
  • Good News for Good Boards from the Supreme Court of Washington

    Late last week, the Washington Supreme court issued a split opinion in Surowiecki v Hat Island that means…

    Read More
  • OR Nondiscrimination Declaration

    In 2021, the Oregon legislature enacted House Bill 2534-A (“HB 2434-A”), which prohibits discrimination based…

    Read More
  • Nonprofit Act Changes

    As of January 1, 2022, Washington State has a new law that applies to all…

    Read More

    If your homeowners' association is looking for a dedicated staff, you'll find them at Barker Martin. Our HOA had been in discussions with the developer for some time, but had made little progress. Barker Martin explained the process clearly, always kept us up-to-date, and worked extremely hard to bring the situation to a successful ending. They work not just for you, but with you. Our construction project is within days of completion. There is no way we could have accomplished it without Barker Martin.

    Ann Koppy, Village at West Park Condominium

    On behalf of Timberton Village Homeowners Association Board of Directors, I would like to express our sincerest appreciation for the efforts of the entire Barker Martin Team for the successful defense of the protracted lawsuit against our association. Many thanks to the Team for their advice and guidance throughout the process our stressful lawsuit. The time and effort spent in getting to know our association was impressive.

    Bill Centobene, Timberton Village Homeowners Association

    Our HOA felt we were in a hopeless situation with minimal legal rights and we didn't trust anyone after what our builders put us through. Dan Zimberoff was always "cautiously optimistic" about our case, but in the end he had turned our situation into a major win that no one expected. I would recommend Barker Martin to all my friends with complete confidence. Dan will be our HOA attorney for many years to come

    Josie Adams, 1100 East Howell Owners Association

Ready to protect your community?

Ready to protect your community?

Whether you're facing a pressing legal issue or just need trusted guidance, we're here to help. Let’s discuss your needs—no pressure, no jargon, just honest advice from experienced HOA & condo law professionals.